<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nobody Cares What You&#8217;re Doing Right Now (and why they still might follow you)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.authortechtips.com/2009/07/nobody-cares-what-your-doing-right-now-and-why-they-still-follow-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.authortechtips.com/2009/07/nobody-cares-what-your-doing-right-now-and-why-they-still-follow-you/</link>
	<description>help for writers timid about technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:27:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Clark</title>
		<link>http://www.authortechtips.com/2009/07/nobody-cares-what-your-doing-right-now-and-why-they-still-follow-you/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.authortechtips.com/?p=368#comment-66</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re spot-on. Twitter has quickly evolved from &quot;what are you doing right now?&quot; to &quot;how entertaining and/or informative can you be?&quot;. If you want people to pay attention to you, you need to be interesting - which is why marketers seem to be dropping off Twitter in droves. Average run-of-the-mill marketers can&#039;t make a dime using Twitter because they&#039;re not the least bit interesting and nobody actually pays attention to them. Those that are personable and interesting are the ones that are sticking around and doing well.

There&#039;s going to be a backlash sometime in the next year or two where publishers and employers will realize that a large follower count is completely meaningless. Nobody who follows 10,000 people is paying attention to even a fraction of them, and people with 30,000 followers themselves should realize that unless you&#039;re interesting, they&#039;re all tuning you out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re spot-on. Twitter has quickly evolved from &#8220;what are you doing right now?&#8221; to &#8220;how entertaining and/or informative can you be?&#8221;. If you want people to pay attention to you, you need to be interesting &#8211; which is why marketers seem to be dropping off Twitter in droves. Average run-of-the-mill marketers can&#8217;t make a dime using Twitter because they&#8217;re not the least bit interesting and nobody actually pays attention to them. Those that are personable and interesting are the ones that are sticking around and doing well.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s going to be a backlash sometime in the next year or two where publishers and employers will realize that a large follower count is completely meaningless. Nobody who follows 10,000 people is paying attention to even a fraction of them, and people with 30,000 followers themselves should realize that unless you&#8217;re interesting, they&#8217;re all tuning you out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
